A MUST READ!
Translated from my husband Thomas Finn
We stopped by the American embassy yesterday afternoon to show sympathy and support for the many Iranians who had turned up for a demonstration that ran simultaneously in many countries across the Free World.
Several people have written to us over the past few weeks, been grateful for what we have shared, and in return shared their own stories with us.
These are stories about what happens to a society when Islam takes it over. Not individual Muslims — that is not what this is about. But Islam as a political and civilisational system, with its own logic, its own phases and its own end goal.
What they describe, I am trying to gather below, so that it is understandable for everyone — even well-meaning politicians — because most of it sounds like a warning. A warning to the Western European person and society, lulled into civilisational sleep, who has not yet seen that the fate of the Iranians lies much closer to their own than they imagine.
When Iranians talk about what happened in their country, there is something that recurs in almost all accounts. Not the details — those vary. But the structure of what happened and how. That is the same. And it has phases.
PHASE 1: Arrival
At first there is nothing to see. People arrive, settle down, live their lives. They are discreet, hardworking, unproblematic. You would feel hysterical expressing concern. And that is perhaps precisely the point.
.
PHASE 2: Infrastructure
Then the institutions begin to appear. Meeting places. Schools. Organisations with reassuring names. It is presented as religious freedom — and it is, in a way. But it is not only that.
A mosque is not just a place of worship. It is an organisational centre, a legal advisory point, a political mobilisation point and a social control system in one. It defines who belongs to the community and who does not. It establishes norms for marriage, upbringing, gender roles and the relationship to the surrounding society — not as guidance, but as obligation. Islamic free schools are not just schools.
They are generation-shaping institutions that ensure the next link is not assimilated but consolidated. And the many charitable and lobby organisations with their neutral names and friendly faces are not just civil society. They are the political layer that translates demographic weight into institutional influence.
All of this is infrastructure. And infrastructure is never neutral. It always exists for something.
.
PHASE 3: Demands and Immunisation
Then come the demands — at first modest, almost reasonable. Special considerations here, exceptions there. Most people think “Well, what does it cost me to grant them that.” And at the same time something slightly mysterious — and for some unsettling — that anyone who questions them quickly discovers that there is already a language ready to shut down the conversation. That language did not arise by itself. It is also infrastructure.
The mechanisms are familiar once you have seen them. The accusation of xenophobia that cuts off any factual conversation. The selective offence that is activated precisely when it is useful. The threat of violence that is never officially endorsed, but never officially condemned — and which nevertheless governs what can be said, drawn, printed, performed. And behind it all — the gradual norm shift, where the unthinkable becomes debatable, the debatable becomes accepted, and the acceptable becomes the norm — without anyone ever sitting down and deciding it.
.
PHASE 4: Two Cultures in One Society
At some point there are two cultures in the same society. Two sets of norms. Two ways of understanding what a human being is, what a woman is, what the law is for. The Iranians know this state from the inside. They describe exactly this.
“You lived one life at home and another in the street. Not because you chose it. But because it was the only way to survive.”
To survive on…
This is where people tend to believe it stops. That the parallel culture is the endpoint — something uncomfortable, but manageable. Something you can live with. And many believe it, because that is precisely what they have been told. By their politicians. By the Man on Television. That it would be fine, if only they were inclusive enough, open enough, tolerant enough. That diversity in itself was a guarantee. That the only thing that could go wrong was intolerance.
But it is not the endpoint. It is the preparation.
.
PHASE 5: Takeover and What Gets Overwritten
What came after in Iran came quickly. Those who had supported the movement — left-wing intellectuals, feminists, nationalists — several of the same conscience-troubled groups we see here at home — they were the first to be purged. Up against a wall. Thank you for your help, we no longer need you. The coalition with them was a means. But it had never been a goal.
.
PHASE 6: Cultural Revolution and Norm Inversion
In Iran’s case. The universities were closed for three years. The humanities — law, sociology, psychology, economics — were rewritten. Music banned. The sexes separated. Women’s legal status pushed back to 7th-century standards. Street names Arabized. It did not happen slowly. It happened in months, because the foundation had been laid over decades.
.
PHASE 7: Civilizational Replacement
What hurts most, when Iranians in exile speak about it, is not the loss of freedom, even though it is immense. It is something else. It is the attempt to erase Persia itself. The 2,500-year-old civilization of Cyrus, Zoroaster, Hafez — systematically Arabized. Street names. Language. Calendar. History.
Because this is not politics.
It is civilizational replacement.
In Europe, we do not yet know what phases 5, 6, and 7 will look like. But we know what there is to lose. The same as the Iranians lost — just under different names. Not Hafez and Zoroaster, but Grundtvig and Luther. Not the Persian mosaics, but the Romanesque churches. Not Nowruz, but Christmas. Not Tehran’s secular universities of the 1960s, but the intellectual freedom that made them possible — the right to doubt, to mock, to draw, to leave one’s inherited faith without it costing one’s life. The right to seek freedom outside a closed book that claims to define it. A freedom that did not arise by itself, but was fought for over centuries, and rests on a specific understanding of what a human being is — an understanding not shared by what is now moving in.
.
What is interesting is not that it happened. It is that it followed a pattern that was readable all the way along — for those who were willing to see.
That pattern is 1,400 years old. It has not changed. Not because it has not had time. But because in its own logic it cannot change. It is not a cultural tradition that develops in encounter with others. It is a totalitarian system of thought with built-in immunity AGAINST change — and with a very precise internal consequence for those who try.
European politicians believe they are in dialogue. That they are negotiating. That somewhere out there a compromise is waiting that can satisfy both parties and preserve what is essential. It is an understandable mistake — because that is how Europeans themselves think. You project your own mentality onto the other party and assume that everyone at heart wants the same thing — a reasonable outcome, nobody wins completely, nobody loses completely.
But that presupposes that the other party thinks the same.
We know from the twentieth century that the human brain does not necessarily do that. The Totalitarian Mind — the mindset that is willing to sacrifice everything, including its own population, for a non-negotiable truth — cost the world over a hundred million human lives in the last century. We know it. We have written the books. Built the memorials. And yet again and again we install the notion that everyone fundamentally wants the same as us.
They do not.
This need not surprise anyone.
It can only surprise those who have decided not to look.
Iran is the clearest example, because it happened compressed and within living memory. But the pattern is the same everywhere it has occurred — Egypt, Syria, North Africa, Anatolia — only at a slower pace.
The phases are not a theory.
They are a historical description.
And it is high time for the European person to wake from their sleep.❤️🔥🪽
If you are an Iranian in exile you are very welcome to comment — if there is anything I have missed or left out.
The post is welcome to be shared and translated into whatever language you like.
In the photo — Krisztina and a, to my surprise, completely fluent Danish-speaking doctor from Iran, who has been here for 10 years with his family. A wonderful meeting. ❤
- Thomas Finn 11/4-2036