“You f*cking retard.” That was a comment on one of my posts about Israel and the Jews. There are plenty of those.
I clicked the blue check mark. The profile was Dan Bilzerian. Nearly 30 million followers. I dug a little deeper to understand how a profile gets that big with so little awareness behind it. Then I came across his November 2024 interview with Piers Morgan.
It did not get better.
Bilzerian does not just hate Israel. He hates Jews. So much that he is now running for Congress on exactly that hatred. He is running in Florida against Randy Fine, a Jewish Republican congressman he publicly calls a fat Jew, and who, incidentally, is endorsed by President Trump.
He has said he wants to kill Israelis.
Partway through that interview, Piers Morgan sat there and called him a Nazi. Directly. After a long pause. Bilzerian did not move an inch.
Let us take what he says, sentence by sentence. Because when you pull it apart, there is no man with a viewpoint standing there. There is the oldest lie in Europe, recycled word for word.
He says Jews think they are better than everyone else.
That their faith teaches they are the chosen ones. That is a distortion. Chosen means chosen for responsibility. To keep the commandments. To be of use to others. It is an obligation, not a ranking. Bilzerian takes a word about duty and turns it into a word about a master race, because that is the version he needs.
He says Israel treats Palestinians like subhuman beasts.
Listen to the word he picks. Subhuman. That is not random. That is the Nazis’ word, untermensch, and he puts it in the mouths of the Jews. The man accusing others of dehumanizing reaches for the Nazis’ own vocabulary to do it.
Then comes the Talmud.
He says it teaches Jews that non-Jews are animals, that Jesus is burning in excrement in hell, that the Virgin Mary is a whore. Let me explain what the Talmud actually is, because he is counting on you not knowing. That is his entire trick.
The Torah is the five books of Moses. The written law. The Talmud is something else entirely. It is the transcript of the argument about how you then live by it. It was compiled between the years 200 and 500, across three centuries, by hundreds of rabbis in two different countries. 2,711 pages. It takes a person seven and a half years to read it through once.
And here is what matters. The Talmud is not a book of rules. It is the record of an argument. Open a page and one rabbi says something. Right after, another says the exact opposite. Then a third steps in and says they are both wrong. Sometimes they reach agreement. Often they do not.
And here is the part that stuns people: the losing position stays in the text. By name. Forever. That is not sloppiness. That is the whole principle.
The rabbis held that a rejected opinion had to be preserved, because a later generation might face a situation where it turned out to be the right one. So they kept the disagreement instead of deleting it. They called it a disagreement for the sake of heaven. The argument itself is sacred.
No other world religion has done this. No popes. No fatwas. No final answer key. Just generations of people arguing with each other in writing, where the dead answer back to the living.
Then there is the second layer. The Talmud holds two kinds of material. There is the legal part, how you actually live. And there are the stories. Legends, folklore, dream interpretation, the medicine of the day, astronomy, riddles and tall tales. The stories have never been binding. No Jew has ever been required to live by them.
Every passage Bilzerian cites is a story. Not one of them is law.
And why are there harsh words about Christianity in there at all?
Look at when it was written. The Temple had been burned down. The Jews had been driven out of their own land. Two young religions were fighting over who inherited the same history, and one of them was taking over an empire. It is polemic written by a group that had lost everything, about the movement pushing them aside. Written 1,800 years ago.
There is one obscure story that some scholars read as a reference to Jesus. One passage. Out of 2,711 pages. Not a law or a rule to live by. Not something any Jew today is taught.
Bilzerian took a couple of quotes he found online and now performs as an expert on a work that takes seven and a half years to read. Pulling the harshest line out of that ocean and saying this is what Jews believe is exactly the method antisemitic propaganda has always used.
He never once quotes a Jew who lives by it. He quotes a lie that was handed to him.
Then he says Jews have mass-murdered Christians.
Turn it around and see how grotesque it is. For two thousand years it is the Jews who have been hunted, expelled and murdered by Christian powers. The Crusades. The Inquisition. The pogroms. The Holocaust. It runs one direction through all of history, and it is not the direction he points. He takes the victims’ history and hangs it around the victims’ own necks.
And then he gives himself away completely.
He says their faith permits the rape of Palestinian prisoners. He is referring to Sde Teiman.
Let me tell you what that case actually is. A Palestinian prisoner was severely abused in 2024. Who uncovered it? Israel’s own army. Who investigated? Israel’s own military police, more than a hundred witness statements. Who filed charges? Israel’s own prosecutor. It became one of the most divisive scandals in the country’s history.
That is the exact opposite of a rule permitting it. It is a crime the Jews’ own country dragged into court itself. Bilzerian takes a crime Israel condemned and investigated, and calls it a religious teaching.
And now the question nobody puts to him. How many times has Hamas done the same?
Zero. Not one investigation. Not one indictment. Not one fighter put in front of a judge.
In March 2024, UN Special Representative Pramila Patten found reasonable grounds to believe rape and gang rape occurred at several locations on October 7th, and clear and convincing information that hostages were subjected to sexualized torture in captivity. Hamas answered by denying all of it. Not investigating. Denying.
Bilzerian has called Hamas a resistance organization and their leader Yahya Sinwar a hero.
So lay it out as it stands. One country uncovered the crime itself, investigated it itself, and prosecuted its own. The other side denies, celebrates, and calls the perpetrators heroes. And Bilzerian points at the first one and says the evil is over there.
That is not ignorance. That is a lie, and he knows it.
The rest is the same recipe.
There are two billion Muslims, he says, as if a population figure were an argument. He uses the number to move the word. Not them, he says, them over there. The Israelis are the real terrorists. But a number proves nothing about who does what. It is a rhetorical switch, not evidence, and it lands on exactly the people who were massacred on October 7th.
We are funding a genocide, he says, reaching for the heaviest word available while nobody can make the numbers add up.
Look at the pattern. Every accusation is about exactly what was done to the Jews. Dehumanization. Mass murder. Terror. He takes everything the Jews have suffered and hangs it around their necks.
It is not a new idea. It is the oldest one there is. And the man saying it is running for the United States Congress. With nearly 30 million followers.
That is why I write. Not for his sake, he is lost. But for the thousands who scroll past and do not know that every word has been said before, by men in uniform, right before the trains left.
He calls me unintelligent. I just took every one of his sentences apart. He brought a slur. I brought the sources. Suck it up!